| Author |
Topic: Difference between Ephedrine and
Psudoephedrine? |
Kirt NewBee |
posted 12-22-1999 06:48 AM
I am a beginner to the chemistry field and could someone tell me the
difference between Ephedrine and Psudoephedrine? Can a person extract the
E needed out of ephedrine as well as he/she can from psudoephedrine? What
ingrediants need I look for that I do not want?? Someone, Please? Also,
here is a dumb one, what is H2O2?
------------------
I'm out! The Captain
|
hypo Hive
Bee |
posted 12-22-1999 09:59 AM
E differs from P by configuration on the carbon bearing the OH-group.
Since OH group is probably what you want to remove, P is as good as E.
H2O2 is hydrogen peroxide. I suggest that you do not proceed to the
experimentation level until you get some chemistry intro.
|
Kirt NewBee |
posted 12-22-1999 01:18 PM
Hey Hypo, I know my questions sound dumb but I already had a dream and it
was a beautiful one! The yeild could use a little improving but the dream
was sweet! I just ain't to hip on all the chemcal terms! WHich would be
very helpful if I were! So one can extract good e from ephedrine just as
well as psudoephidrine? I was told awhile back that the ephedrine pills
were not what I wanted! It was the psudo only! Anyone help me
understand Y this would be true?
------------------
I'm out! The Captain
|
Android Hive
Bee |
posted 12-23-1999 04:47 AM
The only difference that's important to me between the two, is psuedo's
readily available where I live. That, and I don't care for the high the
Ephedrine reduced meth gives me. Leans more towards the adrenaline and not
enough euphoria. Chemically, they're mirror images of each other. Kinda
like a newbee and a gnat.
------------------ "ARROGANT &
CYNICAL" (Ticklish,too!)
|
mrr
pyrex Hive Bee |
posted 12-23-1999 05:32 AM
Good one Android!! Gnat and Newbee....Rollin on the floor, pissin
uncontrollably :-) Pyrex out of piss
|
hypo Hive
Bee |
posted 12-24-1999 08:02 AM
E and P are NOT mirror images, damnit! They are epimers, it means they
differ in only one stereocenter.
|
Xtract Hive
Bee |
posted 12-24-1999 08:26 AM
Droid I respect youre opinion are you saying there is a differance in
highs? Ive thought for a long time they maybeee way differant. You noticed
they took Ephedrine off the market? Why???? Psudo is Psudo i.e. not th....
same not mirror images, Phuck I hate when I cant seee what Ive typed. Do
any of you know what they really look like?
Xmenot
|
Android Hive
Bee |
posted 12-24-1999 03:32 PM
I see no argument with the newbee/gnat theory, wypo. Not certain of you
facts, maybe?  Xgnat.
Brown nosing will only attract flies. What I'm saying is of no importance.
Ask anyone!
------------------ "ARROGANT &
CYNICAL" (Ticklish,too!)
|
dextram Hive
Bee |
posted 12-24-1999 03:50 PM
That sounds like pretty reputable talk the real question would of course
be though will in fact due to the difference in the chirality of the
epicentrical OH group will this in fact cause slightly different reactions
such that possibly during workup maybe pseudo goes through transition upon
the c2 spot and that ephedrine would go through trabsition in the c5 spot
irregardless of these activities how many might agree that this in fact is
a cyclization event in the benzene ring???
I have some reliable pictures of pseudo and the structure problem is
the citation is not so specific in the dfination of the diagrams it
appears pseudo forms a bit of a different ester, that the ster is in fact
not a benzene ring strugture I dont know enough about different esters to
really explain presently but these esters concerned might possibly be
esters from that umm stuff a while back umm something explosive it is um
found in asprin apparently can be got from asprin, used to make colored
crystals to check for MDMA apparently is a process for eluting chemical
physical charesterics um posed within the last month I belive, I think
polymerization is a real posibility with and strange products whith these
methods including many possible amphetamine like substances not all of
course should be defined as meth.
|
anhydrous NewBee |
posted 01-11-2000 09:41 PM
refluxing your psudo will give you 50/50 and old trick of mine
|
Sky Hive
Bee |
posted 01-11-2000 10:22 PM
I've got DL psudoephadrine from DR. that made much better meth than the
OTC shit you can get I know its been Discussed in here I think there are
different Isomers in both psudo and Ephadrine. and the shit you get OTC is
not going too be the good stuff.
|
Methamphibian man Hive Bee |
posted 01-12-2000 03:04 AM
Just an observation: sudafed 12 hour is a pill that has ONLY
psudeoephedrine in it with a thin outside coating that is easily scraped
and peeled or washed off. it is the cheapest price too!
|
Yman Hive
Bee |
posted 01-12-2000 03:50 AM
Hey wow,...Android did not really flame us ! and in his own way really did
answer our questions. Thanks Wo.... An. Did you see the way Worlock
trashed that guy the other day? POor NewBee> Seeyaa.
|
Xaja Hive
Bee |
posted 01-12-2000 03:50 AM
Yeah but it's got binder shit in it that can make life very difficult.
Although you can dissolve it in cold water, filter real quick with a
buckner, then heat it. Whole lotta jelly shit comes out. But now the
bitch: it won't filter anymore. Jelly shit clogs filters. But for small
quantities, heat it in an enamel dish and the jelly shit seems to stick to
the enamel. But it really is a bitch. Avoid them if you can.
|
Snotbrain Hive
Bee |
posted 01-12-2000 02:49 PM
Anhydrous, please explain further your reflux routine. ?? You reflux what,
how, to get what??
H2O2 is what it takes to make you blonder, kirt!
|
Snotbrain Hive
Bee |
posted 01-12-2000 03:44 PM
I wonder if the reflux accomplishes the same thing as the heating and
pressurization referred to in the dwarfer "nickel" thread? (By readyeddie)
do you use acid also: or just water??
snodder
|
Acme Hive
Bee |
posted 01-12-2000 11:51 PM
This came up in the general forum 3 monthes ago
posted 10-12-1999 09:03 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This
will seem pathetic, but is the d- or l- isomer the desired one, and how
exactly is pseudoephedrine different from ephedrine (just stereochemistry
or r they consitutionally different) Also are any of these compounds at
all stimulating on there own, or dangerous? (i know of an OTC medicine
which is DXM and pseudo, any problems there?)
Acme Member posted 10-12-1999 01:58 PM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hoping
you can deciper this shorthand They both have the
formula C6H5CH[CH(NHCH3)CH3]OH they differ in stereochemistry eph
(-) 1R,2S eph (+) 1S,2R psu (-) 1R,2R psu (+) 1S,2S Not sure
which is called d- or l- . It would be a wild guess to say (+) is d im
just not sure. Hopefully some wiser bee can clue us in on which is d or
l and which one would be best (for your cold, of course)
CHEM GUY Member posted 10-12-1999 02:00 PM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Slappy,
where did you get that info? I'm not questioning you but I just want the
reference-
CHEM GUY Member posted 10-12-1999 09:15 PM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From
Fornsic science international, 48 (1990), 123-34 "...(-) ephedrine or
(+) pseudoephedrine yeilds (+) methamphetamine."
From the journal of Forensic science, page 956
"...(-) ephedrine and (+) pseudoephedrine yeild d-methamphetamine"
Therefore (+) methamphetamine is d-methamphetamine.
|